Is
the U.S. Bullying Other Nations into Following their
Geoengineering-Chemtrail Agenda?
Posted by Brian Andrews Chemtrail News,
Featured Tuesday, February 8th, 2011
The U.S. thwarted the UN ban on geoengineering because
profits are more important than life on this planet.
Source:
Conscious Life News. According to a
cable released by Wikileaks, the former United States
ambassador to France recommended “moving to retaliation” against
France in late 2007 to fight a French ban on Monsanto’s
genetically modified (GM) corn. Former Ambassador Craig
Stapleton (now co-owner of the St. Louis Cardinals baseball
team), who was concerned about France’s decision to suspend
cultivation of Monsanto’s MON-810 corn, wrote the following to
diplomatic colleagues: “Country team Paris recommends that we
calibrate a target retaliation list that causes some pain across
the EU since this is a collective responsibility, but that also
focuses in part on the worst culprits.”
In late October, 2010, many chemtrail/geoengineering activists
applauded the announcement of a
UN
ban on Geoengineering. More than 190 nations agreed to ban
geoengineering under a United Nations treaty to protect the
diversity of life on Earth. The ban stipulated that “no
climate-related geoengineering activities that may affect
biodiversity take place, until there is an adequate scientific
basis on which to justify such activities and appropriate
consideration of the associated risks for the environment and
biodiversity and associated social, economic and cultural
impacts.”
However, there was one big problem: the United States was not
one of the signatory countries. In the video below, Sonia of
“The Truther Girls” pointed out that the ban was most likely
useless without U.S. agreement: “The U.S., when it comes to New
World Order, and unfortunately the destruction of our
environment, is among those leading the charge.” Sonia also
provided a detailed analysis of the
document that apparently was drafted by the U.S. in response to
the ban. She concludes: “It looks to me like the U.S. is
trying to think of a way to get the rest of the world on board
with the geoengineering program – not to stop it.”
Sure
enough, less than six weeks later, the following headline from
the Activist Post hit the net: “UN
Climate Concern Morphs into Chemtrail Glee Club.” The
accompanying article details the events at the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change in Cancun, Mexico: “In
Cancun, Mexico, the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change is under pressure to overturn the UN ban on
chemtrails… The US has not agreed to it. Citing profits, the US
further refuses to cut greenhouse gas emissions attributed to
global warming, the purported concern of the United Nations.
Instead, it seeks to expand its geoengineering projects for
which hundreds of patents have already been filed.”
Apparently, the ban was either overturned or never implemented.
Shortly after the Cancun convention, the spraying intensified
worldwide.
How in the world did one single country manage to convince
193 others that profits were more important than protecting life
on this planet? Could they have used the same strong-arm tactics
that they used against France for non-compliance with their GMO
agenda?
