World Gathering For Truth's
LESS OZONE, MORE DISEASE,
margareta-erminia.cassani @ worldnet.att.net
I've been getting reports
from all over the United States and Europe of heightened
Chemtrails activity up from a decreased (but still present) activity
over the summer months of June, July and August. I've also
been reading reports of the growing fungal-based diseases in
humans, plants and animals as well as skin and respiratory
cancer rates around the world. Judging by the news that just came
out of NASA Headquarters yesterday, Sept. 7th, the connection
seems all too clear to this researcher.
On September 7th, 2000,
Release 00-137 reported to NASA News that "the largest ozone hole
ever was found over the Antarctic" and that it was the
outrageous size of "three times larger than
the landmass of the
United States". Measured by a NASA
ozone "hole" (sounds more like a separate
planet!) measured a
record size of approximately 11 million
square miles (28.3 million square kilometers) when
measured September 3rd, 2000. This beats the earlier record of 10.5
million square miles (27.2 million square kilometers) measured
September 19, 1998. Apparently, the spread of the hole's size has
stabilized but the low levels of its
interior continue to
fall - this is somewhat typical, however, as
the lowest readings
in the ozone hole are seen in late
September, early October.
For those "ozone skeptics"
and/or "ozone spin doctors" out there who keep telling us that the
growing ozone holes and their concomittent damage are a "normal
cycling" and that there's nothing to be
concerned about, this
researcher would ask them to please answer
1. Why the frenetic
worldwide activity in our skies to create some sort of cloud cover via
what we now call "Chemtrails"?
2. Why does the United
Nations have extensive Global Warming Protocols in place outlining
the real environmental and human dangers of growing ozone
holes with worldwide participation of countries involved in ozone
measuring, ozone-patching, and ozone-effects related
3. Why are the rates of
human skin cancer occurrences and deaths skyrocketing?
4. Why the proliferation of
fungal-based diseases in both humans, animals and plants?
5. Why are our amphibian
populations dying off and becoming extinct with genetic
6. Why are polar animal
researchers finding "skinny" polar bears, a phenomena that
occurs when their environment becomes too warm, the polar
ice melts, the bears cannot get out into the water on ice
flows to "fish", hence they do not eat for months and are
forced to live off their existing fat stores, thus losing enormous
amounts of weight, their young dying from lack of nutrition
from their mothers?
7. Why have researchers
found newly formed "lakes" at the North Pole from melted ice?
If its all nothing to be
concerned about, why is the United Nations spending billions of dollars
on an ozone research program when they are financially in arrears to begin with? One would think that such a seemingly
"trivial" and "natural cycling occurrence" such as some ozone critics
would have us believe would not warrant a body like the
United Nations taking such a profound and expensive interest in.
Such acute and widespread activity that just happens to mirror
the acute and widespread and has-to-be expensive activity
in another area which critics also want to write off to "normal
and trivial" activity, and that would be.. ta-da!
Although reading NASA's new
spectrographic analysis reports on the new dimensions of the
astronomical size of the Antarctic ozone hole lends credence
and support to those of us researchers who can connect the dots in
the ozone-environmental breakdown- human disease-Chemtrails
maze, why do the rocket scientists at NASA have to be the ones to
break the news to us in bit by bit sound bites and press
releases? Is it the "give them a little at a time" psychology? Too much
bad news at once causes chaos?
Maybe But, with all those
"men" in our United States government, especially the two groups
running for Presidential office this year talking about
"accountability and morality and honesty" ad
nauseam, and in the
United Nations even, doesn't any of them
have the grande
cajones to be honest and just tell us what
we're facing with this badly damaged ozone and the
Tellerian* attempt to deflect the sun's rays a mere 1% by injecting
sunlight-scattering particles via the
activity of the last two years? After all,
don't these guys and
their families breathe the same air we do?
Won't the same sun
burn their skin? Aren't they going to get
the same illnesses we
*Edward Teller, senior
research fellow at the Hoover Institute, proposed this "promising
approach" to offset any possible ill effects of a damaged ozone
and growing global warming problem.
See, Sunscreen for Planet
Earth, Hoover Digest 1998, no. 1,
Sources: NASA Headquarters
Release 00-137. TOMS ozone data and pictures are
available on the Internet at:
(Note: looks like above website has had
Above report at: