PENTAGON VIDEO EVIDENCE SHOWS
FRAUD OF WAR ON TERROR
By David Bosankoe, B.Sc.
Notes in 2008 by
Irving, World-Action: David Bosankoe's website no longer appears to
be available. I hope David, himself, is okay. David
Bosankoe, B.Sc., carried out much scientific analysis
of various video stills. A very impressive study. It
is likely that his detailed analysis is still
available by being backed up somewhere on the
Internet. Some searches may bring quick results.
few months ago the American Department of Defence
released to the World Media the five security-camera
(CCTV) frames that capture the attack on the
Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia that occurred on
September 11, 2001.
frames were broadcast across the Internet News
agencies where I was able to pick them up and
enlarge them, after which I joined them together in
a single animation file which can be found on my
attention was initially brought to these frames as I
was searching for evidence in support of my position
in an argument with
Dick Eastman, an American who
regularly posts his analysis, forwardings and links
to uk.politics.crime and other newsgroups. We were
arguing over the French web page, "Spot the Boeing":
was expounding his theory of an internally planted
bomb and, to show him his error I went to the BBC
and did a search for 'Pentagon' and found the CCTV
images. That's when I made my first animation from
before, American investigator, 'Agent Fescado,'
provided on the website,
his own analysis of the CCTV stills based on
evidence that included his own enlargement of the
first frame in the sequence with added overlays of
different aircraft, using the position and size of
the tail fin of the actual attack craft shown in the
first frame as the reference for determining scale
and position of the overlay.
THE REALITY: A MUCH SMALLER AIRCRAFT
found was that the profile of the plane captured in
the frame when compared to the fitted overlay of a
Boeing 757, where the tail fin of the overlay is
fitted to exactly cover the visible fin of the
attack aircraft in the video, was far shorter than a
Boeing 757 (a rather obvious observation which
nevertheless I later proved with mathematical rigor
on my web site). What Fescado also found was a
tail-fin fitted overlay of an F-16 made for a very
reasonable fit, as also do other small military
aircraft such as S-3B Viking (a craft which has been
suggested by one of Agent Fescado's sources as the
true Pentagon-attack culprit.).
which small military aircraft was responsible for the
attack, is a question that must not distract from the
now-established finding that the Boeing 757 of Flight
77 was not the aircraft that the CCTV visually
captured, an aircraft which in my estimation is less
than half the length of the 757.
Afterward, I found the Internet source for the MSNBC
Flash animation of the CCTV images and extracted the
Flash file out of their page, allowing me to use the
inbuilt zoom function in Flash which includes a
pixel interpolation function so I could quickly
extract smoothed pictures. I've explained how to
trace my steps in all this for you who want to 'do
it yourself' at:
(not available unfortunately)
used a shareware version of Jasc Animation Shop to
string this together in an 'animated GIF' which so
many have now seen thanks to Dick Eastman.
comparing proportions in the first frame, the height
of the Pentagon's wall, 70 feet, with the 155 feet
length of the Boeing 757, it becomes blatantly obvious
that actual attack plane is far too short.
finding led me to look at the size of the hole that
the plane made.
the plane crashed into the Pentagon, it first of all
made merely a hole and, only later, after fire crews
had arrived on the scene, did the outer wall of
Pentagon above this hole collapse.
Fortunately, someone who was on the nearby freeway and
passing the Pentagon during the first moments of the
attack had his camera with him and managed to get some
really good shots of this hole (see my homepage:
is surprising. I approximate it to be between two and
three meters across. Not only was the hole too small
for a Boeing 757 to have made, there was also an
obvious lack of plane wreckage. The wings were nowhere
to be seen. There was no luggage, seats, or other
debris that one expects from this type of crash.
saw the damage report on the extent of the internal
damage. That too was inconsistent with an mid-sized
is just the beginning. In the first CCTV image a white
smoke trail is visible to the right following the
plane. However, the problem with this is that jet
contrails only happen at high altitudes when the water
vapor from a jet's exhaust freezes into a trail of
visible ice crystals. So the only explanation of this
white smoke is that it is the rocket-engine emission
from a small missile.
conclusion is supported by evidence in the second
image, where the initial fireball appears vividly as
the flash explosion consistent with a small missile
warhead. On two counts of visual evidence,
therefore, we see that a missile was launched at the
Pentagon by the attacking plane.
AND: 'THE WAR ON TERROR'
conclusion, instead of knife-armed terrorists with
limited flight experience hijacking a modern passenger
plane and flying it into the Pentagon at ground level,
we are forced to conclude that a military jet with
auto pilot capabilities flew into the Pentagon, firing
a missile just ahead of impact.
remarkable is the choice of the point impact, a point
only metres away from the only fire hydrant on that
side of the building. This was the hydrant for the
heliport, with underground tanks, in case of
helicopter crashes. (Again see my homepage.) Whoever
planned the attack likely was thinking of damage
knowing that the attack craft was not a Boeing, it is
abundantly clear to me that the US Government has lied
to us about Sept 11th.
only conclude that they did the deed themselves as a
propaganda operation to 'justify' to the American
people (and their allies) their sought-for war against
the Taliban and their 'War on Terrorism'.
other people's investigations it has become clear
that this was for oil and opium and geopolitical
gain, NOT to liberate the brave suffering women of
that country (though, in itself a good cause, it was
used for propaganda purposes).
line of 911 research has been has been restricted to
the Pentagon attack. However, I have added many links
and articles to my website referencing investigations
parallel to my own, including, especially, questions
raised by the World Trade Center attack.
many questions that the US Government should be
answering about that.
most notable I can recall are these:
there a big increase in insider trading just before
CEO's from the WTC invited to a charity dinner at
around 8am on the morning of Sept 11 at an air base?",
did the twin towers collapse the way they did (like a
controlled demolition, falling straight down and not
EASTMAN, at my request, has provided
his own summary points:
WTC/911 SUMMARY POINTS
BY DICK EASTMAN, YAKIMA, USA
Getting the pipeline the Taliban had rejected;
Control of the mineral wealth of Afghanistan;
Generating a popular and sufficient reason to attack
Saddam Hussein (whom both father and son Bush have
long wanted to see dead);
Continued sustainability of the infamous "ring" of
Afghan opium becoming Chinese heroin becoming
laundered revenue proceeds becoming investment capital
building new Chinese industry forcing the relocation
of industry away from U.S. territory;
money for the FBI, CIA, military industrial complex;
Destruction of WTC-housed evidence in the biggest-ever
illegal oil swap case;
Destruction of WTC-housed evidence in the biggest-ever
gold price fixing case (illegal selling of Federal
Reserve gold to elites at way below obtainable market
Getting the FBI off white collar and bank crime
(i.e. introducing total anarchy to the sphere in
which the U.S. investment bankers, currency traders,
derivatives makers etc. operate);
the CIA ("Capitalism's Invisible Army" as R.
Buckminster Fuller called it) take over the FBI (the
more legitimate and traditionally constitutional of
Federal investigation and intelligence agencies) and
in so doing purging the FBI of leadership sympathetic
with anti-globalist, populist, nationalist,
constitutionalist, or pro-sovereignty thinking -- in
fact it is the druglords taking over the constabulary;
Accomplishing pre-emptive war set-up to look like
retaliatory self-defence, i.e., picking fights,
against all "potential" terrorists by setting-up the
those suspected of being capable of resorting to
terror, actually conducting terror themselves so
they can pin the blame on those they want to
decimate, those who stand in the way of their
economic and geopolitical dominance.
II. REMOTE-CONTROL CRASHES:
flight 10.31.99 -- clear case of remote-control
take-over; data captured on blackbox voice recorder
and on instrument recorder make it unmistakable that
the plane was taken over against the will of pilot and
co-pilot (a voice -- English, not Arabic, actually is
heard in the voice recorder saying "control it" at the
moment the controls begin to misbehave -- the efforts
to refute this have only landed the government in
deeper in a coverup -- EgyptAir and the Egyptian
government accept this view and not the obviously
cooked findings of the U.S. review board.)
flight in Queens -- breaks up in air -- after rudder
begins moving first right and left -- breaking off the
tail fin -- another whitewash by U.S. aviation
officials as well.
Flight -- rudder goes wild on its own, then stops.
This was a "test" of the remote-control systems.
Brown's crash in Croatia -- same deal, and then, to
make sure Ron Brown got a bullet in the head by the
first "rescuers" on the scene.
Plane that hit the South WTC tower --
Note the Japanese video showing another aircraft
streak by at the moment of impact -- presumably a
guidance aircraft or a missile to do the job in case
the plane missed its intended target. (There is very
little data on this besides the video itself, so we
tend to leave it alone, but it is definitely part of
the big picture.)
III. PENTAGON "SMALL JET"
the "smoking gun" that could finish the crime
syndicate responsible for 911 -- unfortunately the
crime syndicate knows this very well and the American
people have hardly begun to get the word.
VIDEO -- the Bosankoe evidence.
HOLE -- the French evidence and the photo from the
WITNESS ACCOUNTS -- those who saw a horizontal
approach claim the plane was too small to be a Boeing
757 -- many military men who did not see said they
heard a jet fighter, some heard a missile.
TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS claim plane behaved like a
IV. STAND DOWNS
INTELLIGENCE -- FBI prevented from investigating
(after merger with the CIA they won't even try, btw)
INTERCEPTIONS -- could have, but didn't -- ordered
not to -- many many sources on this; many officials
(Cheney, Rumsfeld) caught in falsehoods
V. PHONEY BIN LADEN VIDEO
bin Laden video (Dick says: I have lots of analysis of
this that are on no site that I know of -- I had
forgotten this until now).
Evidence of prior planning and attempts to enlist
other nations in war against Afghanistan pre-911
(Powell in India, most especially; but many others).
AND THE LESSER STUFF:
behavior on the day and subsequently.
statements before 911.
Wolfowitz lightening appraisal and conclusion that
war on Afghanistan is necessary.
Economic links of Bush, Cheney etc. to profiteering
from exactly this war.
The short-sells and where they lead.
Yakima, Washington State, USA.
E-mail: eastman @ bentonrea.com
(Dick Eastman frequently has to change e-mail
addresses due to harassment.)
World-Action: I think Dave Bosankoe's website is no
longer available, but you may find some of this
dedicated scientist's work available at other
websites, or at an Internet archive site, such as the
Wayback online facility at:
David's references as originally published with this
My home, including enlargements of the CCTV frames and
My archive of articles and related news article links:
Links to other investigations into the US Governments
complicity on September 11th and various other related
DAVID BOSANKOE, B.Sc., U.K.
LIE AND DECEPTION